[Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Thu Sep 4 04:33:20 UTC 2014


If it's striped as a cycleway but also allows pedestrians, that'd be
highway=cycleway, foot=yes.  For situations like the divided parts of the
Riverparks East trail, that'd be highway=cycleway (though even though this
already implies foot=no, I explicitly tag as such, since pedestrians have
their own highway=footway that is bicycle=no adjacent).


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> 2014-08-18 15:36 GMT+02:00 Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com>:
>
>> > 1) official cycleway
>> highway=cycleway
>>
>
> What about something that is both footway and cyleway (segregated or not
> segregated)?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140903/8586ed2e/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list