[Tagging] Tag for livestocks pens

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Mon Sep 8 12:44:05 UTC 2014


FYI, according to taginfo (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/landuse)
landuse is already used 226 432 times on a node. So not everybody thinks it
is incompatible with nodes.


regards

m



On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Severin Menard <severin.menard at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for providing these links. My comments inline below.
>
> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 14:00:00 +0200
>> From: Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>
>> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>>         <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag for livestocks pens
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAKjckOn Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:00 PM, <
>> <CAKjckyPEQ0dtRR-YDwB5HXVe44PWmbZNK4jY7rp7rwMEkwK9zw at mail.gmail.com>
>> tagging-request at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>>    Re: Tag for livestocks pens (Martin Vonwald)
>>
>>
>> >> Am 01.09.2014 12:20, schrieb Severin Menard:
>> >> > How should we map the livestock pens in farmyards?
>> >> barrier = fence
>> >> And (IMHO): it should be a permanet installation and no temporary
>> thing...
>> >>
>> >
>> > Thanks for your answer. Sure for barrier=fence, but it does not say what
>> > is inside the fence. The houses have a fence for the people and those
>> ones
>> > are for the animals. When it deals with potential epizootics, it is not
>> the
>> > same thing. What about pen=yes or run=yes? (I do not find any
>> occurrence in
>> > taginfo, though). livestocks=* would serve to mention the kind of penned
>> > animals.
>> >
>>
>> This should help:
>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=animal_keeping
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Danimal_keeping
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Martin
>>
>
> Actually we have used a landuse=livestocks so far and the issue is we
> cannot always draw their extent as they can be small (but mapping them
> remains important), what would lead to just put a node, but this is
> incompatible with the landuse key. And I do not feel logical to draw a
> polygon that does not represent the reality. I am wondering if for a node
> we could not use the combination of:
> animal_keeping=yes (or animal_keeping=pigs, goats, etc. as suggested
> animal_keeping:type=* as also suggested
>
> and if a polygon is doable:
> barrier=fence
> landuse=animal_keeping
> animal_keeping=pigs, goats, etc. as suggested
> animal_keeping:type=* as also suggested
>
> What do you think?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Severin
>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140907/01ebf5d3/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of Tagging Digest, Vol 60, Issue 18
>> ***************************************
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140908/8b601c50/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list