[Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

[Paul Johnson]

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Tod Fitch <tod at fitchdesign.com> wrote:
>
> It might be considered duplicative, but what should a data consumer do if
> confronted with a surface=* value that is unknown to it (and the wiki)? We
> aren't talking human intelligence here where an informed guess is possible.
> Should such a way be considered paved or unpaved for purposes of routing?
> From that point of view, Richard's proposal gives a lot of clarity.
>

Same way as if the surface tag was missing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140920/c5c6c2fd/attachment.html>