[Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligatory
Hubert
sg.forum at gmx.de
Mon Apr 13 21:36:42 UTC 2015
Hallo.
Sorry for not answering for a while. I had/have to concentrate on my
studies.
As for bicycle=obligatory/mandatory, I can see why there is so much
objection for introducing a new value, but I still think that the current
use of bicycle=official/designated/yes is less optimal than it could be.
If some you feels up for it, I would like to hear your thoughts on the
following separated cycle way >>with and without<< the corresponding traffic
sign.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Separated_cycle_and_foo
t_path.jpg)
The way I see it, it is official and designated for cyclist in both
cases, at least from the wording. However, the question remains whether it
should also be tagged as bicycle=official/designated or bicycle=yes or
something else.
I would also like to ask you to considered the normal situation
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Separated_roadside_cycl
e_and_foot_path.jpg) in the same way and in comparison to the stand-alone
cycle way.
Yours,
Hubert
From: Hubert [mailto:sg.forum at gmx.de]
Sent: Freitag, 27. März 2015 23:57
To: 'Tag discussion, strategy and related tools'
Subject: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligatory
Hallo fellow mappers and bicycle enthusiasts,
I have created a proposal to tag obligatory roadside cycle ways with
bicycle=obligatory.
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/obligatory_usage>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/obligatory_usage
The proposals is in its early stages right now, but I would like to get your
ideas and comments already.
This value can be interpreted as an counterpart to bicycle=use_sidepath.
As this tag would replace bicycle=designated in a quite a few cases, I am
hoping for a lot of support from the community.
Happy mapping
Hubert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150413/672fbfdf/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list