[Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

[Bryce Nesbitt]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> wrote:

>
> 2015-04-20 2:14 GMT+02:00 David Bannon <dbannon at internode.on.net>:
>
>> Would camp_site:pitch=42   be more appropriate ?
>>
>
> I think the number should go into ref, e.g.
> ref=42
> camping:pitch=yes or camp_site:pitch=yes  (etc., e.g. permanent, tent,
> ...) not actually proposed or detailed yet
>

I think ref has a different meaning.  Imagine you imported a park service
database of pitches, each might
have a ref different from the pitch number known to the public:

tourism=camp_site
operator=Aurthur Dent
addr:housenumber=100
addr:street=The Road
name=The Answer Campground
sanitary_dump_station=yes

   addr:unit=1
   ref=AZQ-1A
   sanitary_dump_station=no

   addr:unit=42
   ref=AZQ-42A
   sanitary_dump_station=yes

   highway=service
   addr:interpolation=1
   adrr:unit=43-101
   ref=AD-ROAD-123


Now imagine say "The Answer Campground site 42" and getting routed all the
way to the pitch.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150420/b5366d73/attachment.html>