[Tagging] landcover=trees definition

christian.pietzsch@googlemail.com christian.pietzsch at gmail.com
Mon Aug 3 07:20:44 UTC 2015

landcover=trees has it's origins in this proposal:
The proposal wanted to seperate the phsyical landscape (landcover) from the
cultural landscape (landuse). But the proposal never got the support it
needed to get established.

cheers Hedaja

2015-08-03 0:55 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć <daniel at koć.pl>:

> I have just discovered that while landcover=trees has no Wiki page, it's
> quite established tag (I wouldn't say "popular" here, because it's just
> about 1% of forest/wood uses) and we could officially define as a generic
> tag for trees areas, when it's not clear for the mapper if it's natural or
> not ("forest" vs "wood").
> Do you agree with this idea?
> --
> "The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags
> down" [A. Cohen]
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150803/f2b067fb/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list