[Tagging] bicycle=use_sidepath applicable to bicycle lanes?
voschix at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 17:48:14 UTC 2015
Yes, Paul, lane tagging would solve many if not all of my tagging problems.
But, as far as I know, there are no renderers that would interpret the data
correctly. In particular the OpenCycleMap renderer does not do this (yet?).
That's why I try to avoid lane tagging (I know ... we are not tagging for
the renderer, but I do not want to have to produce my own renderer and I
need it soon for a specific local project.)
On 8 December 2015 at 15:45, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> Modal lane tagging. bicycle:lanes=no|no|no|designated (left three lanes
> closed to bicycles, right lane a designed bike lane). May also be joined
> with something like, motor_vehicle:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no to exclude
> motorists from the far right lane...
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Two situtions where I have doubts on correct tagging
>> A) In the case of a road with two cycle lanes with mandatory use (they do
>> have the official cycle path signs - case L1a in
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle) how do I tag correctly the
>> mandatory use on the highway:
>> 1) by bicycle=use_sidepath
>> 2) by bicycle=use_cyclelane (or bicycle=use_sidelane?)
>> B) In the case of a oneway road with one mandatory opposite-direction
>> cycle lane (they do have the official cycle path signs in the direction
>> opposite to the car flow - case L1a in
>> bicycle:backward=use_sidepath (or use_cyclelane or use_sidelane)
>> bicycle:forward=yes (or bicycle:forward=share_carlane?)
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging