[Tagging] Access restrictions for shoulder lanes?

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Feb 2 14:41:56 UTC 2015

Seems like a combination of parking tags and access tags are in order.
Typical restrictions in the US would be emergency stopping only,
bicycle=yes, foot=yes unless posted otherwise or, in Oklahoma's case,
there's a minimum speed posted...
On Feb 2, 2015 8:32 AM, "Martin Vonwald" <imagic.osm at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that access=no (or vehicle=no) leads in the right direction, but
> we are still missing the information that it might be accessed in case of
> break downs or similar. No? Or don't we care about that?
> 2015-02-02 15:07 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale <colin.smale at xs4all.nl>:
>>  Assuming you are talking about the "hard shoulder" AKA "emergency lane"
>> on motorways, in NL and GB it would quite simply be "access=no". The only
>> exceptions are if you break down, if you are an emergency service, or if
>> you are instructed to by the police (or similar authority).
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150202/edac7b91/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list