[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Obligatory vs., optional cycletracks)

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Feb 2 17:10:19 UTC 2015


On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>
wrote:

> No. If - for example - you need to turn left on the next crossing and the
> adjacent cycleway is separated from the main road so that it is not
> possible to turn left from the cycleway, you are allowed to switch to the
> main road and drive on it in order to turn left. So bicycle=no is never
> correct in such situation.


Un "no" the applicable segment and put in a turn relation?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150202/101da5e0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list