[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking
johnw at mac.com
Sat Feb 21 23:17:50 UTC 2015
So how does one differentiate between a common use lot that is private
And a *shop* that offers that? Isn't there some need for the shop=* in some regard.
> On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:30 AM, John F. Eldredge <john at jfeldredge.com> wrote:
> If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to certain people, such as residents of a particular neighborhood, use access tags as well. It then becomes the responsibility of the renderer to check these tags.
> John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
> "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
>> On February 20, 2015 4:34:16 PM John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>:
>>>> So it would become:
>>> I wouldn't use the "shop" key but something like "amenity", and "motorcar" is a legal access restriction, so should be something different as well.
>> From my earlier post :
>> Amenity=Vehicle_storage sounds great for when it is an amenity of a lager facility
>> shop=vehicle_storage sounds great for a business that offers this service.
>> If you are looking for Vehicle storage services, a bunch of arrows popping up on lots in planned communities and military bases that you can never use isn’t very useful.
>> You are right about the vehicle tag - what values do you suggest?
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging