osm at tobias-knerr.de
Fri Feb 27 12:50:19 UTC 2015
On 27.02.2015 13:05, Dave F. wrote:
> What's the purpose of bridge=movable?
> It's good that the different types of bridge are tagged & the graphics
> are excellent, but I'm unsure why they need to be separated to a sub tag.
For many applications, it makes sense to treat all movable bridges the
same. Besides, not everyone is an expert on bridge types, but
recognizing a bridge as movable is pretty easy.
> If there is a genuine reason, then surely there should be the equivalent:
No, as there is no special treatment e.g. in routing for static bridges.
Besides, with how many static vs. movable bridges there are, it's kind
of the default.
More information about the Tagging