[Tagging] Sidewalk tagged on highway=cycleway
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at gmail.com
Thu Jan 1 21:25:09 UTC 2015
I support revert of ulamm's edit.
2015-01-01 22:09 GMT+01:00 715371 <osmu715371 at gmx.de>:
> Hi,
>
> there is a sentence on
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
>
> which says
>
> "It is also possible to use {{Tag|sidewalk|right}}/*=left [on
> highway=cycleway] to indicate which side of the segregated path
> pedestrians should walk on (where right/left is relative to the way's
> direction)."
>
> It was originally contributed by ulamm and modified by RobJN after a
> short discussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:RobJN).
> But this is the opposite of what is written on
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
>
> "The inclusion of sidewalk information makes it easier to provide
> effective pedestrian routing, and in particular good narrative
> descriptions of pedestrian routes along motorised roads. The sidewalk
> tag is not needed on non-motorised thoroughfares, for example
> highway=footway/cycleway/path/brideway/track. "
>
> I think there better solutions to the problem than ulamm's.
>
> If there are no further arguments, I will remove the sentence from the
> first citation. What is your opinion on that?
>
> Cheers
> Tobias
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150101/45880dae/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list