[Tagging] question: best practices for micromapping ped areas and footpaths?
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Jan 2 09:57:26 UTC 2015
2014-12-30 11:50 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
> make the entire area highway=pedestrian and have the building=roof are on
>> a layer above it?
>>
>>
> I would go for this option.
>
+1, I'd normally use a multipolygon relation to represent the roof if it
has the same extent as the pedestrian area below (to avoid overlapping
ways).
> You could go for covered=xxx as well, as Hubert indicated
>
+1, on the pedestrian area below. See this as an attribute (this space is
covered). You could have the roof anyway as an additional object (e.g. to
add details about the roof) or have the covered-key on the pedestrian area
to indicate some kind of covering (i.e. the roof could be mapped either
explicitly or implicitly).
cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150102/a8cdb619/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list