[Tagging] correct access tagging for tourist attraction

[fly]

Happy new year

Am 31.12.2014 um 19:05 schrieb Greg Troxel:
> 
> johnw <johnw at mac.com> writes:
> 
>> perhaps use the =destination tag instead of =private on the road you are supposed to use. 
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access>

Please, no.

> I agree.  There's also access=customers that I use for parking lots.
> access=destination is supposed to be some legal notion in the UK.   In
> the private facility case, it's really a question of some places being
> signed for no access and some being welcoming, but it a
> with-permission-of-landowner kind of way.

I still prefer access=permissive as I often take short cuts by foot
across these private roads without being a customer.

> Another approach is to use access=no for the ones you shouldn't use (and
> for which almost no one among the public gets permission)

That is access=private and not access=no

> and
> 
>   access=permissive
> 
> for the one the public should use.  It's a little off; presumably going
> there at night is not ok.  But as a
> represent-the-world-with-what-we-have-now approach, it seems like a
> pretty good fit.

+1

access=permissive is the one we need here, access=destination has some
legal aspect.

The other roads would be access=private.

Still be careful with access=* as it might depend on your traffic mode
and foot/bicycle/horse/ski might have different rules.


cu fly