[Tagging] correct access tagging for tourist attraction
John F. Eldredge
john at jfeldredge.com
Sat Jan 3 23:12:00 UTC 2015
So a reasonable solution would be to tag roadways as access=private if they
can only be used by specific people such as residents or maintenance
vehicles, and access=destination if the general public can use them to
enter a particular area, but can't use them as a through route.
--
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On January 3, 2015 11:03:36 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Typical situation in Poland is that only residents may drive on some roads
> in housing estates - not everybody who wants to reach this place.
>
> So I am using vehicle=private - despite the fact that it is quite different
> from
> private as in "only one person may use this road". vehicle=destination
> is not a correct tagging here.
>
>
> 2015-01-03 17:48 GMT+01:00 Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>:
>
> > John F. Eldredge wrote:
> > > That is how I had interpreted access=destination also. Just because
> > > it has a specific legal meaning in the UK doesn't mean the tag can't
> > > be used elsewhere in the world.
> >
> > Absolutely - this is true of pretty much every highway= value and they,
> > too,
> > have been adapted for use elsewhere.
> >
> > I'd echo the call not to use access=private on housing estates. Last year I
> > was working on a (commercial) project to plan thousands of delivery routes
> > in the urban US, using OSM data and routing software. The only serious
> > issue
> > we encountered was exactly this: the router couldn't plan journeys to
> > estates where each road was tagged with access=private.
> >
> > We could have told the router to ignore access=private, but this would have
> > created wrong routes in other situations. Using access=destination would
> > have prevented this.
> >
> > cheers
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/correct-access-tagging-for-tourist-attraction-tp5828203p5828886.html
> > Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
>
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150103/193e54a1/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list