[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 110

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Jan 23 05:45:44 UTC 2015


On 23/01/2015 10:22 AM, tagging-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:38:34 -0800
> From: Bryce Nesbitt<bryce2 at obviously.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> 	<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Water tap
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAC9LFPc9JAX1dGO3VFd-uvCmRWnKLFBiQq-WGz77WCB7EXRuaQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Kotya Karapetyan<kotya.lists at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> You're messing with existing successful tagging efforts, making it harder
> for those who came before you,
> and effectively asking others to clean up after you. * The "exactly how to
> do it" is to address the issues and start over.*

I suggest Bryce you come up with a better tag for a water tap, drinkable 
or not or somewhere between those two, any temperature, any tap handle, 
any spigot?

As for "successful tagging efforts" .. the success may be measured by 
the resultant maps. But not by the confusion of newer mappers. I'll have 
further to say on that in my thread on tagging philosophy, much later 
when everyone has had time to make there thoughtful comments.

Thanks for your input. I look forward to a better tag for water tap. 
And, if you'd be so kind, the thinking behind it?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150123/6f71a753/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list