[Tagging] Disputed area
7h3.arch at gmail.com
Tue Jul 21 21:10:31 UTC 2015
I think it would be better to create separate relations for disputed
territories instead of introducing new roles. Your approach would break
many existing applications.
There's already a proposal:
Am 21.07.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Eugene Alvin Villar:
> My idea is to replace the use of 'inner', 'outer' (and the deprecated
> 'exclave', and 'enclave') roles in a type=boundary relation with
> 'defacto' and 'dejure' (or 'claimed') roles. The 'inner' and 'outer'
> roles are very trivial to compute (assuming a relation is properly
> constructed) and are actually redundant information.
More information about the Tagging