[Tagging] Mapping private home toilets

[Mateusz Konieczny]

"access=no or access=private do not seem to make much sense"
Toilet may be open only to to a limited public - in military base, only for
employees or out of order.

2015-03-02 19:37 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
> 2015-03-02 19:05 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
>
>> I'm opening a discussion about at least mechanically re-tagging
>>  operator:type=private
>> into "access=no" or "access=private", so that rendering software can
>> choose to omit these locations depending on the map purpose.
>>
>
>
> according to the wiki, the tag amenity=toilets is for "a toilet open to
> the public", so access=no or access=private do not seem to make much sense.
> http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150302/3c7e4a72/attachment.html>