[Tagging] Blatant tagging for the renderer: bridges & abandoned railways
moltonel 3x Combo
moltonel at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 10:10:47 UTC 2015
On 11/03/2015, johnw <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
> Actual physical bridges - which may offer the only way across a ravine, or a
> landmark to where you are on a river sounds like a similar justification -
> so rendering abandoned, yet physically existing bridges seems like exactly
> the kind of thing that would be included - especially since their inclusion
> would offer no clutter or distraction at levels where other items would
> cause quite a lot of visual clutter for similar orinentation benefit.
Again : the osm-carto dev agree that all bridges should be rendered.
It's two longstanding bugs, it takes time to fix. Not rendering
abandoned railways (wether or not on top of a bridge which should
itself be rendered) is a separate issue (this time not a bug but a
More information about the Tagging