[Tagging] Rendering of individual power lines in residential areas on default osm-carto
Bryce Nesbitt
bryce2 at obviously.com
Thu Mar 12 01:58:29 UTC 2015
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:35 PM, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
> wrote:
> I don't agree to use highway=* + utility_wires because of the lack of
> information it introduces.
> The member nodes of the highway=* way won't reflect the real position of
> (and some other details about) the poles supporting utilities networks
> beside the road.
>
I don't care to map to a greater level of detail. So the utility_wires tag
adds *more* information than *no* information.
I do of course realize this is less detail than tagging each pole, lamp
stand and bird nest.
--
That said, the two schemes don't seem particularly incompatible either.
The utility undergrounding information, even just on a road by road basis,
is important in terms
of emergency services and after huge storms. In California where I live
communities vie for conversion
to underground utilities for these reasons among others.
-------------------------------------------------------
The rendering folks need fairly simple rules to go by.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150311/86fd8825/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list