[Tagging] Tagging established, unofficial and wild campings

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Fri Mar 13 18:58:39 UTC 2015


This is covered in tagging #5

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:50 PM John Sturdy <jcg.sturdy at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it would be good to mark these, with a suitable description;
> prohibited, no, or closed perhaps?  If it's still a landmark that
> people will recognize as a campsite, it can be useful for navigation,
> and it may help to implement the prohibition, in that people turning
> up there will have some kind of indication that it is not to be used
> for the purpose that, on the ground, it looks like it's meant for.
>
> __John
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Dave Swarthout <daveswarthout at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> What to do with places where one cannot camp?
> >
> >
> > Sure
> >
> > camp_site=prohibited or camp_site=no  [for an icon: a tent with a slash
> > through it :-) ]
> >
> > or even
> >
> > camp_site=disused
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Swarthout
> > Homer, Alaska
> > Chiang Mai, Thailand
> > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150313/be922b65/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list