[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule

[Warin]

There is little point in having a draft, then a comments period if 
people are not participating then, choosing to only come forward with a 
possibly good idea only in the voting period.

For teh English timid .. there are not many that care about bad English 
expression here .. you may get corrected .. but most will intend that 
for clarification rather than abuse.  So don't be affraid of the bad 
English!

So .. please express yourself during the RFC comments period! It is 
helpfull .. you may get others pointing out errors in your view.. argue 
back by all means .. particularly if you disagree.. it is a discussion 
after all. Keep to the point .. and don't attack the person.

The RFC period is where things can easily be changed .. not so in the 
voting period. So do, by all means, criticise, suggest and discuss 
during the comments period.. if you don't argue back people will 
consider you have agreed. So .. consider .. discuss .. and discuss 
again. But do that before the voting.



On 14/03/2015 9:51 PM, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
> Nowhere, but I repeat my question:
>
>> What purpose does this serve except frustrating the proposal process? 
>> Please speak up!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jan
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:16 AM Jörg Frings-Fürst 
> <osm at jff-webhosting.net <mailto:osm at jff-webhosting.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Am Samstag, den 14.03.2015, 09:34 +0100 schrieb Jan van Bekkum:
>     > > I saw that one user declined both my proposals
>     > > (shop=storage and power_supply=intermittent) in the voting stage
>     > > without any argumentation and without earlier participation in the
>     > > discussion. What purpose does this serve except frustrating the
>     > > proposal process? Please speak up!
>
>     Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated
>     previously
>     allowed to vote?
>     >
>     [...]
>
>     CU
>     Jörg
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150315/73d44f56/attachment.html>