[Tagging] Accepted or rejected?

[David Bannon]

Yep, count me as +1

David

On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 15:04 +0100, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> 
> I think we deviated from the original question quite a bit. The point
> was that the current number of votes proposed in the wiki for
> accepted/rejected decision was self-contradicting. Even if there may
> be different opinions on that, the very discussion shows that the
> situation is not clear.
> 
> 
> I propose to clarify it by changing the recommended number of votes
> in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features#Approved_or_rejected
> from "...8 unanimous approval votes or 15 total votes with a majority
> approval..."
> to "...8 or more unanimous approval votes or 10 or more total votes
> with more than 74 % approval...".
> This will not change anything in terms of the ongoing discussion of
> how the approval influences other things. So the discussion can
> continue. But we'd introduce some mathematical logic in the process.
> 
> 
> I don't think there is a procedure to vote on such proposals, so
> please just give it +1 here if you agree. We change it when we have 8+
> "plus ones" if there are no significant objections to this change.
> Once again, please note: we are not discussing the consequences of
> approval/rejection, we just change the rule of thumb recommendation to
> a mathematically more sound one.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Kotya
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>         
>         On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Warin
>         <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>                 > inscription
>                 > 
>                 note (not rendered .. for use by mappers to make notes
>                 to other mappers ? thus not required to be rendered?)
>         
>         Visible in a popup in geschichtskarten for historical items.
>         
>         
>         But you were talking about all renderers I thought. Now you
>         seem happy that there is 1 renderer showing the
>         feature/data ? 
>         I'm still convinced that features that people want to map will
>         be mapped, regardless of the state of the tagging proposal.
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         m.
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>         
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging