[Tagging] Accepted or rejected?

Kotya Karapetyan kotya.lists at gmail.com
Tue Mar 17 23:58:48 UTC 2015


Hi Jan,

Your rule would mean that with 7/3 would be a rejection while 8/7 an
approval.
I suggest to not only bring the logic back but also address this issue.

I agree that it changes the rules, but why not try to improve them?

Cheers,
Kotya


On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I would like to stick to my original proposal. It brings the logic back,
> but doesn't change the rules.
>
>
> *"enough support" is 8 approval votes on a total of 14 votes or less and a
> majority approval otherwise.*
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:07 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <
> dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 17.03.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Kotya Karapetyan <kotya.lists at gmail.com>:
>>
>> I don't think there is a procedure to vote on such proposals, so please
>> just give it +1 here if you agree. We change it when we have 8+ "plus ones"
>> if there are no significant objections to *this* change.
>>
>> Once again, please note: we are not discussing the consequences of
>> approval/rejection, we just change the rule of thumb recommendation to a
>> mathematically more sound one.
>>
>>
>>
>> I also don't think there is a procedure to change the proposal voting
>> system and how votes are counted. 8 votes in favor of a change seem too
>> few, and besides this, IMHO this is not something we should vote on the
>> tagging mailing list, I suggest to announce it more broadly, eg on the
>> national lists and on talk.
>>
>> cheers
>> Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150318/21dc50c7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list