[Tagging] Increasing voting participation (Was Accepted or rejected?)

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 11:54:18 UTC 2015

2015-03-18 8:21 GMT+01:00 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:

> Don't try to make them important, lasting, or binding.

somehow they are lasting. The definition that gets voted is typically the
same that will be in use for some time. Then there will be objects in the
database which are tagged according to that definition, and trying to
change the definition will likely provoke resistance by those that have
been using the old definition. Only in a few cases there will be so many
problems that people will happily change what is there.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150318/38addcce/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list