[Tagging] Historic tower
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 22:54:46 UTC 2015
On 21/03/2015 6:24 AM, André Pirard wrote:
> On 2015-03-20 18:15, Volker Schmidt wrote :
>> On 20 March 2015 at 17:48, André Pirard <A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com
>> <mailto:A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> historic=1200 (for precise minds)
>> This use of the "historic" tag is new to me. Where is it defined?
You can use google to find OSM wiki defined keys/values..
> The suggested tag was "historic = yes".
> The word "historic" is an adjective defined here
> <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/historic?s=t> and is in use
> since about 1600.
> We have already discussed that historic=castle which is "a historic"
> with an attribute "castle" doesn't make sense.
> "historic" is not a substantive describing an object and, moreover, a
> castle is not always historic.
> The logical and natural ways is:
> castle being the attribute (type) of building and historic the
> attribute of castle.
> That's something everybody can understand and even figure without
> looking at the wiki.
> 1200 was a sensible extension.
Not that way... I'd think it would need
But perhaps it would be more universal to have
as it could be used for more modern structures that don't have an
historic association (yet)? !
Wiki search on date ..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging