[Tagging] Tagging method of amenities at camp_sites

[David Bannon]

On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 09:58 +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:

> "It is not necessary or appropriate to use a relation when all the
> elements contained within the boundary of the site belong to the site,
> and no elements beyond that boundary do belong. In this simple case
> simply tag the perimeter with all the appropriate tags. Users of the
> information can simply perform an 'is-in-polygon' test to determine
> which elements belong to the site." [1]

OK, I did not know that !  Is this "is-in-polygon" test something that
is already being done ?  Examples ?

It does mean that a camp_site needs to be mapped as a polygon, not a
node but thats not too bad.

David
> 
> 
> 
> 
> regards
> 
> 
> 
> 
> m
> 
> 
> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:52 AM, David Bannon
> <dbannon at internode.on.net> wrote:
>         On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 07:31 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
>         
>         >         Separate nodes for campground and amenities
>         connected in a site relation
>         
>         Only practical solution IHMO.
>         
>         David
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>         
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging