[Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligatory
sg.forum at gmx.de
Sat Mar 28 12:47:45 UTC 2015
I’m not sure if I understand your question. So please tell me whether I did.
A parallel cycleway to a road with bicycle=no could be very close, even separated by a curb only. If cyclist are prohibited from those driving lanes in general, that cycleway should not be considered bicycle=obligatory but bicycle=designated in my mind. It like you said, routers will find the next available way for cyclists.
> From: Bryce Nesbitt [mailto:bryce2 at obviously.com]
> Sent: Samstag, 28. März 2015 00:26
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligatory
> How close is tagging the road "bicycle=no", with an adjacent
> If the cyclists are prohibited from the road, the routers will find the
> next best route, which may or may not be the adjacent cycleway.
More information about the Tagging