[Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligatory

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 10:10:31 UTC 2015

2015-03-29 18:55 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:

> Routing engines are already capable of handling the situation quite
> handily if the way that bicycles are not allowed on is bicycle=no or
> bicycle=destination.

it's not about ways where bicycles are not allowed on, it is about ways
with other ways nearby, where the other ways have to be taken in certain
circumstances (exceptions might be that the cycleway is not passable (e.g.
snow and ice, littering, parked cars), doesn't lead where you want to go
(e.g. you want to turn left at the next crossing), is not broad enough
(e.g. with a trailer), etc.). "no" and "destination" do not work here, but
"use_sidepath" might work (as it models precisely the type of restriction
and could therefor be evaluated according to the jurisdiction in this
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150330/3cb7f9f5/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list