[Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

[pmailkeey .]

On 6 May 2015 at 11:46, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 2015-05-06 12:41 GMT+02:00 <phil at trigpoint.me.uk>:
>
>> One of the biggest issues I see is that the mapper has to choose between
>> tourism=caravan_site and tourism=campsite,  when the vast majority of
>> commercial sites cater for both.
>
>
>
> this is a non-issue, simply tag everything as tourism=camp_site and
> eventually add caravan=yes/no, and use tourism=caravan_site for
> caravan-only sites.
>
>
-1

That's '-ist' - we should aim for something equal such as:

Tourism=site

caravan=yes
tents=yes
static=yes
RV=yes  [=motorhome]

swimming_pool=yes [etc. inc. other facility=*]




I know a few local tourism sites where the tourist brings only themselves
and rents a static caravan. How should they be tagged ?

The main tag should not favour type at all but type tags should be added as
necessary in whatever combination is appropriate

-- 
Mike.
@millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
& pets*

T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150506/6e07f1aa/attachment.html>