[Tagging] Camps

[pmailkeey .]

On 6 May 2015 at 10:56, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 2015-05-05 23:35 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
>
>> The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
>>
>>    leisure=camp_site
>>    leisure=communal_activity_camp
>>    leisure=caravan_site
>>
>> Or subtags:
>>    leisure=camp_site
>>    caravans=dedicated
>>    tents=yes
>>    communal_activity_camp=no
>>    sanitary_dump_station=no
>>
>
>
>
> Why do you think we should question the established tagging? Isn't this
> "core question" already answered?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site
>
>
Where's RV and static ?

I'd suggest

leisure=site then follow with subtags for caravan, tent, RV, static caravan
and then more subtags relating to the facilities available at the site such
as swimming_pool, play_area etc.

-- 
Mike.
@millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
& pets*

T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150506/c8f1c52f/attachment.html>