[Tagging] access tags (was contact: tags)

[Marc Gemis]

Do you plan to use the same prefix for vehicle, foot, ... ?
Or just for the categories that you listed ?

regards

m

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com> wrote:

> There was discussion about the contact: prefix... now how about the
> "access" tags?
>
> There are a lot of them, and trying to gather and present them is very
> hard:
>
> hov
> boat
> motorboat
> canoe
> bulk
> tanker
> mofa
> moped
> dog
> hazmat
> bicycle
> imdg
> ice_skates
> ...
> ...
> ...
>
>
> These could be mechanically retagged into a namespace:
>
> access:hov=yes
> access:boat=yes
> access:motorboat=yes
> access:canoe=yes
> access:bulk=yes
> access:tanker=yes
> access:mofa=no
> access:moped=yes
> access:dog=yes
> access:hazmat=destination
> access:bicycle=customers
> access:imdg=yes
> access:ice_skates=designated
>
>
> Or perhaps semicolons:
>
> access:designated=bicycle
>
> access:no=dog;mofa;moped;canoe;ice_skates
>
>
>
> And perhaps a small set of "superclasses" could emerge,
> for use in rendering:
>
> foot
> watercraft
> human_powered_vehicle
> motor_vehicle
> motor_cycle
> heavy_motor_vehicle
>
> mobility_aid (e.g. wheelchair)
>
> animal
>
> With the present rich set of tags showing up at level three or more:
>
> access:animal=yes
> access:animal:cat=no
> access:animal:dog=designated
>
> Thoughts?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150510/a3bb9f05/attachment.html>