[Tagging] Proposed tag value: surface=bare_rock

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun May 10 23:06:52 UTC 2015


Hummm ... the mappers want more detail .. the renders less?

A solution?

surface=rock

rock=sandstone: limerock; granite etc

...
Possibly some mappers (with little to do?) will also want


surface=grass

grass= buffalo; couch; etc

?

Most of the surfaces I map are so variable I'm usually using surface=unpaved. The paved ones? Paved, concrete or asphalt.
I don't usually place surfaces on parkland, sports fields etc. Too much detail?



On 10/05/2015 8:51 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Currently there is no good surface value to tag paths with bare rock as
> surface. Such surface occurs typically on paths through mountains.
>
> Among more common tags used for this purpose are
> surface=stone/rocky/rock. These are not clear and may mean also
> different things. Some people also used surface=limerock/granite/...
> but it would be better to use one tag for any kind of material and
> specify type of rock by additional tags (material key?) - it would make
> easier to process these tags. Asking data consumers to process growing
> list of rock types is a poor idea.
>
> Examples of places that may be tagged this way:
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Kriv%C3%A1%C5%88#/media/File:Na_vrchole_Kriv%C3%A1%C5%88a.jpg
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cinibulkova_stezka,_mezi_Bludi%C5%A1t%C4%9Bm_a_Rovinou_%2810%29,_tesan%C3%A9_schody_s_%C5%99et%C4%9Bzy.jpg
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Kriv%C3%A1%C5%88#/media/File:Krywan.JPG
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Absamer_klettersteig.jpg
>
> See also
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:surface#surface.3Dstones.2C_surface.3Drock
> that proposed using surface=rock for this purpose.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




More information about the Tagging mailing list