[Tagging] access tags (was contact: tags)

[Mateusz Konieczny]

On Mon, 11 May 2015 00:27:55 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com> wrote:

> I think the concern about data consumers in general is far higher on
> this tagging list, then among actual data consumers.
> 
> For example:  Any decent data consumer needs to process *both*:
> 
> 
> 
> *    phone=XXX             +*
> 
> *    contact:phone=XXX*
> Else they're missing 100,000 data points.   So even if *phone* was
> mechanically retagged to* contact:phone* (or the other way around)
> data consumers would* not even notice.*

For phone data it may be true, but for access tags (note the thread
title) it is certainly not true - it is unlikely that anybody supports
for example access:foot.