[Tagging] surface=brick -> surface=bricks?

[pmailkeey .]

On 11 May 2015 at 21:40, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:

> Neither is documented at wiki but meaning seems clear and synonymous.
>
> surface=bricks is used 1997 times, surface=brick 541 times.
>
> surface=bricks is also consistent with plural form of popular
> countable surface values - surface=paving_stones and
> surface=concrete:plates
>
> Is there any good reason to avoid changing existing surface=brick to
> surface=bricks?
>
>

   1. Is there any good reason for changing 'brick' to 'bricks' ? If that's
   what you're searching for, look for 'brick', it won't matter if there's ans
   on the end
   2. 'Bricks' clearly describes "bricks" but does 'brick' describe
   'brick-like' as in material [brick dust, (bricks dust)].

We are perhaps familiar with brick walls but not bricks wall - raising the
question should the pluralising s be removed ?

If it's not hurting anyone, leave it alone ?


-- 
Mike.
@millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
& pets*

T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150511/1edec1c7/attachment-0001.html>