[Tagging] housenumber on node and area

André Pirard A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com
Thu May 21 10:45:08 UTC 2015


On 2015-05-21 11:33, Marc Gemis wrote :
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, André Pirard
> <A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com <mailto:A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Info is routinely in two places, e.g. building and
>     associatedStreet, to cope with software or people that do not
>     support one of the places.
>
>
> that depends, some people use associatedStreet only to associate a
> building with a street. They do not repeat addr:postalcode, addr:city.
> Some people repeat addr:street in both, but not everybody does that.
> BTW, addr:city and addr:postalcode is also not repeated in areas where
> the admin boundaries and postal code boundaries are complete (e.g.
> Germany or Flanders).
>
> Don't expect other people to duplicate the info. Don't expect other
> people to leave the data in both places.
I don't expect anything such and this thread is about the housenumber.
As I have said, I want to avoid people or software missing the number
when looking at a building of which the number was put on a node.  What
they miss of data put in by other contributors is beyond my control.
 
Cheers

André.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150521/ff8741be/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list