[Tagging] To mark as covered, or to not mark as covered?

[Brad Neuhauser]

If this is like many fuel stations, it's probably just a roof with no
walls. Typically, I've seen those tagged building=roof. In that case, the
covered=* tag seems redundant.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Bryan Housel <bryan at 7thposition.com>
wrote:

> Isn’t that exactly the situation that `covered` is for - so that
> validators don’t raise a warning about the way passing through a building?
> (I don’t use this tag myself, but I assumed that’s why it exists).
>
>
> > On May 28, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is another excessively mapped "covered" tag:
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182529550
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150528/732715bb/attachment.html>