[Tagging] To mark as covered, or to not mark as covered?
Tod Fitch
tod at fitchdesign.com
Thu May 28 21:05:06 UTC 2015
JOSM’s validity checking will warn against a highway=* going through a building=roof but it accepts it if you add a layer=1, so in this situation I’ve been using the following tagging:
building=roof
layer=1
(and typically other things like amenity=fuel).
Often, but not always, there is a small building under the canopy with an attendant or small convenience market. Using the building=roof + layer=1 combination on the canopy also allows adding the covered building.
Setting the tag “covered=* would make sense to me in situations where buildings overhang or cover the highway but based on how it looks on the ground tunnel=yes seem inappropriate.
Cheers,
Tod
> On May 28, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhauser at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If this is like many fuel stations, it's probably just a roof with no walls. Typically, I've seen those tagged building=roof. In that case, the covered=* tag seems redundant.
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Bryan Housel <bryan at 7thposition.com <mailto:bryan at 7thposition.com>> wrote:
> Isn’t that exactly the situation that `covered` is for - so that validators don’t raise a warning about the way passing through a building?
> (I don’t use this tag myself, but I assumed that’s why it exists).
>
>
> > On May 28, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com <mailto:bryce2 at obviously.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Here is another excessively mapped "covered" tag:
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182529550 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182529550>
> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150528/4271d42d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1868 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150528/4271d42d/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list