[Tagging] To mark as covered, or to not mark as covered?

[Warin]

On 29/05/2015 9:45 AM, pmailkeey . wrote:
> I've seen 'covered' being used (once!) and my opinion is this:
>
> First example under railway bridge, now car park - use tunnel, not 
> 'covered'.
>
> Anywhere within buildings, use tunnel=building_passage.
>
> The only real significant place 'covered' would seem most appropriate 
> would be where a highway is covered where the cover is purely for the 
> benefit of the highway - e.g. West Cornwall covered bridge. So 
> basically, the cover follows the line of the highway and for no other 
> reason than to cover it.
>

Me?
I have a track .. that is 'covered' by an over hanging natural cliff. 
I've not mapped it yet .. as I have not personnally been there ... and 
it cannot be seen from a satellite view.

For things that are 'covered' by a bridge ... tag the other thing as a 
bridge .. not tag tunnel on the thing going under the bridge.

Roofs for petrol stations get tagged building=roof, layer=1 .. and the 
'attached' building gets tagged building=yes or building=retail.