[Tagging] man_made=works
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat May 30 01:01:39 UTC 2015
On 30/05/2015 9:40 AM, pmailkeey . wrote:
>
>
> On 29 May 2015 at 13:06, Daniel Koć <daniel at koć.pl
> <mailto:daniel at ko%C4%87.pl>> wrote:
>
> W dniu 29.05.2015 13:47, pmailkeey . napisał(a):
>
> On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć <daniel at koć.pl
> <mailto:daniel at ko%C4%87.pl>> wrote:
>
> W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a):
>
> I know there is a way to tag what the building as to
> what it was
> initially used for - but i don't think that is the
> proper way
> (afaik).
>
>
> So what do you think about building=church +
> amenity=museum then?
>
> I think we need some clear, general rules. Current system is
> horrible in this matter, but I'd like it to be at least a bit
> coherent.
>
>
> building=museum.
>
> A museum is no more an amenity than a house is.
>
>
> So why do we use building=church + amenity=place_of_worship?
>
> If we tag the building with its function (and not the shape), we
> already know that this is a place of worship.
>
>
> A 'church' should be building=place_of_worship - the building where
> the church congregates - if you want to be accurate about it. Quite a
> few churches meet in other buildings built for other purposes.
>
But not all 'place_of_worship' are buildings.
A church has a particular style, as does a mosque. Both are
'place_of_worship' but the buildings are different.
If museums are not an amenity but building? Are all mappable 'museums'
buildings? I don't know.
-----------------------------
To me the confusion arises out of mapping what is on the ground (e.g.
buildings) compared to the function (e.g. 'place_of_worship').
Perhaps that should be identified on the wiki .. with a similar
prominence as the 'status' property?
---------------------------------------------
man_made=works .. makes no sense as a tag as I don't know what to expect
on the ground nor as a function. ... building=industrial is much better.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150530/91f142e4/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list