[Tagging] improve tagging of traffic_calming

[Dave Swarthout]

I think what Gerd is saying is that if we deprecate the use of
highway=traffic_calming and instead tag each way segment with just
traffic_calming=* (or simply use a node in those case where the structure
of the device is short), we would eliminate the issue where, for example, a
secondary highway changes to highway=traffic_calming, and then back to
highway=secondary, then back to highway=traffic_calming, and back
to highway=secondary, etc.

Eliminating the highway=traffic_calming tag and using *only* the
traffic_calming=* tag for those sections would be a better way to handle
them.

I'm starting to agree with him.

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:19 AM, John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:

>
>
> Javbw
>
> > On Nov 22, 2015, at 9:35 AM, John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > large sections of them on rural roads before dangerous curves
>
> These are heavily signed as being dangerous to fast moving motorcycles in
> the curves, so they are a good thing to map. They have them there to make
> the motorcyclists slow down on the roads (per the warning signs I have
> seen).
>
> These are what I would map as way segments.
>
> https://goo.gl/maps/Mz26VkaF6j62
>
> Javbw
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151122/cd22563c/attachment-0001.html>