[Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Tue Oct 13 11:40:21 UTC 2015


But why?  It seems tools aren't expecting lanes tags with more lanes than
in the lanes count.  Seems exceptionally arbitrary and very incomplete to
count only lanes that a sedan can use.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Hubert <sg.forum at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hey Paul,
>
>
>
> „lanes=*“[1] is for the total number of car traffic lanes and should not
> be confused with the “:lanes” suffix [2].
>
> So “highway=* + oneway=yes + lanes=2 + cycleway=lane” is correct.
>
>
>
> However, your
>
> motor_vehicle:lanes=yes|no|yes
>
> bicycle:lanes=yes|designated|yes
>
> is correct, too.
>
>
>
> Yours Hubert
>
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
>
> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul Johnson [mailto:baloo at ursamundi.org]
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015 13:06
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> *Subject:* [Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
>
>
>
> Seems like some of the examples are wrong.  For example, M2c...
>
>
>
> Wouldn't it be better and more consistent relative to other mode-specific
> lanes to tag it as...
>
>
>
> oneway=yes
>
> cycleway=lane
>
> lanes=3
>
> motor_vehicle:lanes=yes|no|yes
>
> bicycle:lanes=yes|designated|yes
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151013/f8430d89/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list