[Tagging] tunnel=culvert

Gerd Petermann GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com
Sun Oct 25 17:47:17 UTC 2015


Hi, 
I want to thank all of you for the input. I think 
it is common sense (now) that tunnel=culvert
should be used on ways only, so I'd be happy to see
the wiki pages changed so that they don't suggest
to use the tag on a node.
Who can do that?

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: Florian Lohoff <f at zz.de>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 14:39
An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] tunnel=culvert

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> I don't think that this is a strong point.
> Thinking about my own edits I'd say that the
> length could be +/- 4m because typically I just try to place
> the nodes somewhere neer the road, if I find an existing
> node that looks good enough I use that.
>  On the other hand, I think we make
> assumptions about the width of the road based on its
> type (primary, secondary ,etc),
> so this assumption would also apply on the culvert.

So we implicitly assume a width of a road now we propagate
this fault to all attached objects?

We should reduce errors by implicitly assuming something not
increase them.

Flo
--
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
      We need to self-defend - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!



More information about the Tagging mailing list