[Tagging] when should highway=centreline be used?

Gerd Petermann GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 28 14:50:45 UTC 2015


I found another often used tag that seem to be (also) used for 
road markings : 
barrier=line (> 8000)

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 12:18
An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] when should highway=centreline be used?

We need to distinguish two questions, which were mixed up in the
previous discussion, namely

a) should a centre line be mapped at all,
b) if so, how should it be drawn and tagged.

As for a), mapping certainly provides a value on a road with
bidirectional traffic. We can map if it is a solid or dashed line,
or if it is missing.

For a dual carriageway, which is physically separated and therefore
mapped as two separate ways in OSM, I see no value. However these
were examples cited before, where highway=centreline was added to
a physical barrier.

So for b), the centre line needs to be an attribute of a linear highway,
thus tagging highway=centreline does not work. It is also semantically
wrong, since the line is not a highway, and adds a new feature to the
historic elements in the highway valuespace that are not highways
either (highway=traffic_light etc).

Thus we would need a new key as follows:
<new_centreline_key>=[single|double|dashed|etc]

As the line might not always be in the centre, a better name would be
welcome.

The following existing tags need to be considered in this context:
- turn:lanes[:forward|backward]
- change:lanes[:forward|backward]
- overtaking=*

The proposal for Key:road_marking scares me, if we start mapping every
dash of a line we will end with complete clutter.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



More information about the Tagging mailing list