[Tagging] tunnel=culvert

Richard ricoz.osm at gmail.com
Fri Oct 30 18:02:23 UTC 2015

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:03:15PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2015-10-29 13:40 GMT+01:00 Richard <ricoz.osm at gmail.com>:
> > On the other end of the complexitiy scale it would be nice to have
> > a simple method to map insignificant culverts with a single node.
> >
> IMHO, if you don't consider them significant enough to be mapped as a way
> you should maybe not map them at all.

the information that you can cross a stream without getting wet is 
significant. Geometric details are often not interesting or available
in sufficient precision.

> What is the advantage of a node, one click less?

did you count the clicks?
node: "n"+ 1 click + 1 tag/value
way: "n"+2x(click+"p") + "s"+ click + 2 tag/values


More information about the Tagging mailing list