[Tagging] New proposal: Obligatory tagging of oneway on motorway_link
Greg Troxel
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Mon Sep 14 11:27:20 UTC 2015
Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net> writes:
> On 9/13/15 5:38 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>> On 9/10/2015 5:20 AM, Joachim wrote:
>>> Tools to help enforcing the obligatory usage:
>>> [...]
>>> - No routing over undefined oneways
>> The chances of anyone implementing this in their routing engine are
>> approximately zero.
> quite. there are sections of motorway_link highways along the taconic
> parkway in NY which are two way and so lack oneway tags. now it's not
> that hard to go through and fix it, but i'm reasonably sure this is
> not the only place where this situation exists.
My impression is that for motorway_link, 2-way traffic is unusual. So
I wonder about a maproulette challenge that tries to identify
motorway_links that
- lack a one_way tag
- appear to be 2-way from geometry (the hard part)
I would also think that motorway_links that are 2-way would connect to
1-way segments for the actual on/offramp; that could help in identifying
them. If they are right angle with a stop sign, that seems like a clue
for trunk vs motorway.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150914/68036ec5/attachment.sig>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list