[Tagging] do aerodromes need a relation?

[Joachim]

Often aerodrome as areas get added without removing the older node.
IMHO an aerodrome as area/multipolygon is a more detailed way of
tagging an aerodrome. With the rule "one feature = one OSM element"
either the node or the area should be deleted.

About your proposed use of a relation with a label as node: This is
strongly opposed by map style editors and the "label" role was removed
by me from the (proposed) site relation because of this.

About Munich: The duplicated node
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4089995869) was added recently by
mihaii_telenav and will be removed. I already removed it on Stuttgart
airport.

regards Joachim

2016-04-09 11:16 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> Am 08.04.2016 um 13:14 schrieb Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
>
>>> The wiki for aerodromes suggests looking at the mapping of Munich airport.
>>> It also has a node and a way that live in separate worlds. Shouldn't most
>>> tags live in a relation, with the node as a label (similar to administrative
>>> boundaries)?
>
>
> I suggest to do only an area and delete the node.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging