[Tagging] highway=service major type sub-classification - mini vote

[Tom Pfeifer]

Michał Brzozowski wrote on 2016/04/16 20:03:
> I think you miss the point. When there's no service key, you have no
> idea whether it doesn't fit in the current set of (parking_aisle,
> driveway...), or it is indeed but hasn't been tagged because the
> mapper didn't provide this information. It's an informational
> consistency problem, peculiarity of the way we handle things, namely
> non-distinction between "inapplicable" and "unknown".

Yes exactly, thanks. And I have to clean false parking_aisle values from
the main access way.

Please don't forget to vote, and I'd be still open for an even better value.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:service#highway.3Dservice_major_classification_-_mini-vote_for_sub-tag_value

tom

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
>>> Il giorno 15 apr 2016, alle ore 13:40, Tom Pfeifer ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Values for mini-vote:
>>>
>>> service=main
>>> service=access
>>> service=major
>>
>> main and major seem a bit odd (after all, service roads are minor roads, so that would be a "major minor road"? access on the other hand is what all service roads are about (access to a house, a facility, a row of parking lots etc.)
>>
>> I still don't see the need for subtagging service roads with a tag that unlike the well introduced qualifiers says that it's not a less important than a generic service road
>>>
>>> Proposed description:
>>>
>>> Voluntary sub-tag for a highway=service for distinguishing a major service way
>>> from sub-ordinated ways, or generally classify it into the major category.
>>> Examples are the access way into a parking lot (distinguished from parking_aisle),
>>> or a service way connecting several residential driveways.