[Tagging] Satellite visibility of archaeological sites

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Aug 23 13:45:40 UTC 2016

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 23 ago 2016, alle ore 14:02, Bjoern Hassler <bjohas+mw at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Strictly speaking, bing may not have been the source, as the data may come from a ground survey. But would it be reasonable to add "source=bing" if the structure is visible on bing? I suppose "verified:bing2012" may be clearer, and avoid confusion?

any ground survey is much more reliable than an assessment from remote, that's why I would put survey in the source tag when I did perform a survey. Maybe I just don't get the point why you would add bing tags for a site where you have been to. What is the scope?


More information about the Tagging mailing list