[Tagging] Galleries versus art shops
Max
abonnements at revolwear.com
Mon Feb 15 00:29:38 UTC 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2016년 02월 15일 00:55, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> On 9 February 2016 at 02:39, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-02-09 0:20 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen
>> <info at matthijsmelissen.nl>:
>>>
>>> What do you think, would it make sense to try to keep both
>>> shop=art and tourism=gallery?
>
>> I'm for keeping both, but would prefer a less ambiguous tag for
>> the latter, e.g. amenity=contemporary_art_gallery
>
> Currently, basically nobody uses tourism=gallery to tag art
> museums (even though the wiki specifies so), so I don't think there
> is a need to change the tag to something like
> tourism=contemporary_art_gallery.
I see two reasons why it would make sense:
1. the word gallery alone seems to cause so much confusion because of
its ambiguity.
2. if we depreciate tourism=gallery and introduce
amenity=contemporary_art_gallery it would make it clear which tag is
old and should be carefully reevaluated or is a new one following the
new scheme.
m.
ps: I don't like the tourism key for museum or gallery.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlbBG/EACgkQ3EB7kzgMM6I8GwCfZmjiSB4KdR3LjsCKFbeGxT/M
Lz0AnRcJDd3VKzE8Gim78HbgcOQCXaRy
=e8y+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Tagging
mailing list